Skip to content

Cleanup expr -> XML conversion of c_bool constants #4009

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2019

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

This is largely the same as handling any other signed/unsignedbv, thus make them
share code.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

This is largely the same as handling any other signed/unsignedbv, thus make them
share code.
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 0827858).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/99314424

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit 0bf061b into diffblue:develop Jan 31, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the xml-c_bool branch January 31, 2019 17:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants