Skip to content

Replace use of deprecated nil_typet in c_bit_field_replacement_type [blocks: #3800] #3945

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

Use optionalt as recommended in the deprecation note.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚫
This PR failed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 9cfcc9e).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/98611335
Status will be re-evaluated on next push.
Please contact @peterschrammel, @thk123, or @allredj for support.

Common spurious failures:

  • the cbmc commit has disappeared in the mean time (e.g. in a force-push)
  • the author is not in the list of contributors (e.g. first-time contributors).

The incompatibility may have been introduced by an earlier PR. In that case merging this
PR should be avoided unless it fixes the current incompatibility.

@kroening
Copy link
Member

Given that the return value isn't checked before use, this could also be a precondtion.

No caller handles that case, instead insert appropriate PRECONDITIONs.
@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the deprecation-nil_typet-bitfield branch from 9cfcc9e to 83682da Compare January 26, 2019 18:01
@tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Given that the return value isn't checked before use, this could also be a precondtion.

Done.

That said, I am wondering whether we shouldn't either get rid of this code completely or make sure it actually is used everywhere (there are a lot more places handing bit-field types while not invoking this function).

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 83682da).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/98716561

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit 3120f0f into diffblue:develop Jan 26, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the deprecation-nil_typet-bitfield branch January 26, 2019 23:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants