Avoid default constructing code_function_callt [blocks: #3800, #3938]

[tautschnig]

Construct them bottom-up, which is more efficient and type safe.

• Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
• n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
• n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
• Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
• n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
• My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
• n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

[allredj]

🚫
This PR failed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: f882bbf).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/98599935
Status will be re-evaluated on next push.
Please contact @peterschrammel, @thk123, or @allredj for support.

Common spurious failures:

• the cbmc commit has disappeared in the mean time (e.g. in a force-push)
• the author is not in the list of contributors (e.g. first-time contributors).

The incompatibility may have been introduced by an earlier PR. In that case merging this
PR should be avoided unless it fixes the current incompatibility.

[smowton]

For Java I'm 99% certain this can be ==, as Java varargs are syntactic sugar for an Object[] parameter

[tautschnig]

I was assuming so, but that's stronger than what was asserted before so I tried not to silently sneak in that change. Will add it now, though :-)

[allredj]

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 9976eca).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/98716961