Skip to content

Use optionalt<symbol_exprt> when it isn't always set [blocks: #3766] #3874

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 22, 2019

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

Avoids use of a deprecated constructor and makes more explicit whether the
symbol is or isn't set.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the symbol_exprt-optional branch 3 times, most recently from 863e0cf to 6975be9 Compare January 21, 2019 20:40
Avoids use of a deprecated constructor and makes more explicit whether the
symbol is or isn't set.
@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the symbol_exprt-optional branch from 6975be9 to 8a8e42e Compare January 21, 2019 22:49
GCC complains:

../util/irep.h:247:21: error: ‘*((void*)(& __val)+8).irept::data’ may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
     remove_ref(data);

GCC 7 and later are fine without this hack.
@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the symbol_exprt-optional branch from 8a8e42e to f71df24 Compare January 21, 2019 23:18
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: f71df24).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/98095627

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit 7c844fb into diffblue:develop Jan 22, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the symbol_exprt-optional branch January 22, 2019 00:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants