Skip to content

bits2expr must return an expression of the requested type [blocks: #3652] #3806

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2019

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

Do not return the expanded version of the type.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

Do not return the expanded version of the type.
@tautschnig tautschnig changed the title bits2expr must return an expression of the requested type bits2expr must return an expression of the requested type [blocks: #3652] Jan 14, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 26786cb).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/97307983

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit 250f5af into diffblue:develop Jan 14, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the bits2expr branch January 14, 2019 22:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants