Skip to content

strengthen type of parameter of gather_field_types #3742

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2023
Merged

Conversation

kroening
Copy link
Member

The first parameter of ci_lazy_methods_neededt::gather_field_types is always
a struct_tag_typet. This is now reflected in the signature.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

@smowton
Copy link
Contributor

smowton commented Jan 10, 2019

What makes you sure the tag was not already expanded before calling the method?

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 813efa3).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/96898981

@kroening
Copy link
Member Author

kroening commented Feb 3, 2019

Well, we shouldn't expand!

@TGWDB
Copy link
Contributor

TGWDB commented May 3, 2023

Closing due to age (no further comment on PR content), please reopen with rebase on develop if you intent to continue this work.

@TGWDB TGWDB closed this May 3, 2023
@tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

Rebased and re-opened for this still seems to make sense.

@tautschnig tautschnig reopened this May 4, 2023
@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the gather_field_types branch 2 times, most recently from 408deaf to 3758e56 Compare May 4, 2023 12:09
The first parameter of ci_lazy_methods_neededt::gather_field_types is always
a struct_tag_typet. This is now reflected in the signature.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (bce472f) 78.51% compared to head (86640b4) 78.52%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3742   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    78.51%   78.52%           
========================================
  Files         1674     1674           
  Lines       191946   191945    -1     
========================================
+ Hits        150715   150718    +3     
+ Misses       41231    41227    -4     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
jbmc/src/java_bytecode/ci_lazy_methods_needed.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
jbmc/src/java_bytecode/ci_lazy_methods_needed.cpp 98.38% <100.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@TGWDB TGWDB merged commit a9b08e3 into develop May 10, 2023
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the gather_field_types branch May 12, 2023 13:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants