Skip to content

Make __CPROVER_allocated_memory work with non-POD type objects #3595

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2018

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

The precision of local_bitvector_analysist is not sufficient to rule out several
cases introduced in 732ce2a.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: cc9e551).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/95163014

@@ -1017,14 +1017,14 @@ goto_checkt::address_check(const exprt &address, const exprt &size)
if(flags.is_unknown() || flags.is_dynamic_heap())
{
conditions.push_back(conditiont(
not_exprt(deallocated(address, ns)),
or_exprt(allocs, not_exprt(deallocated(address, ns))),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

allocs seems like it should be a list of allocations, not a boolean, how about renaming it in_bounds_of_some_alloc?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've added a second commit doing the suggested renaming, thanks!

The precision of local_bitvector_analysist is not sufficient to rule out several
cases introduced in 732ce2a.
This is a Boolean expressions, and the name should convey this.
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 8eac552).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/95246160

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit bd6c79e into diffblue:develop Dec 19, 2018
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the allocated branch December 19, 2018 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants