-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 273
Goto symex state clean-up #3445
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
romainbrenguier
merged 18 commits into
diffblue:develop
from
romainbrenguier:refactor/symex-part4
Nov 26, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d1be84d
Remove typedef used only once
romainbrenguier 1410f06
Use ranged for instead of iterators
romainbrenguier 6527421
Remove typedef used only once
romainbrenguier aff8880
Remove typedef used only once
romainbrenguier 607ed1c
Make framet a struct
romainbrenguier 5344bee
Make threadt a struct
romainbrenguier 0b7ff55
Remove trivial constructor
romainbrenguier a30d8a7
Remove typedef used only once
romainbrenguier 41508c9
Remove unimplemented declaration
romainbrenguier 6896b16
Remove field that is assigned but never read
romainbrenguier 4443c61
Replace constructor by default values for fields
romainbrenguier c61a00d
Replace constructor by default values for fields
romainbrenguier c1eda5e
Use ranged-for instead of iterators
romainbrenguier 9153342
Remove typedef used only once
romainbrenguier 512c30b
Use auto for iterator type
romainbrenguier f4b1533
Use ranged-for instead of iterators
romainbrenguier 9b4843e
Use ranged-for instead of iterators
romainbrenguier 27b4b03
Remove typedef used only once
romainbrenguier File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't know that was the convention. I only found this in the CBMC coding standard:
Prefer use of class instead of struct.
But that seems to be out of date.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In general people use class when there are virtual functions, but I don't think it's explicitly a CBMC convention.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The C++ Core Guidelines has two guidelines which relate to this: