Skip to content

Document remove asm #3405

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2018
Merged

Document remove asm #3405

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2018

Conversation

danpoe
Copy link
Contributor

@danpoe danpoe commented Nov 13, 2018

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

/// Adds a call to a library function that implements the given gcc-style inline
/// assembly statement
///
/// \param function_base_name: name of the function to call
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nitpick: : Name... etc

@peterschrammel
Copy link
Member

@danpoe, please fix the doxygen warnings.

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 6e05d99).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/91903769

@danpoe danpoe merged commit 1550f2d into diffblue:develop Nov 20, 2018
@danpoe danpoe deleted the docs/remove-asm branch June 2, 2020 17:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants