Skip to content

Conps minisat [blocks: #3243] #3282

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

nmanthey
Copy link
Contributor

@nmanthey nmanthey commented Nov 6, 2018

This PR is a follow up for #3243 as the question for how to build CBMC with the conp-solutions minisat fork can be achieved.

This is WIP, because it has to be decided how/where to apply the changes. In case CBMC wants to move away from its MiniSat-patch approach, I might incorporate the solver changes to enable Werror again into my MiniSat fork.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

To be able to parse options again when setting up a solver, the
parseOption method has to be present. Hence, link against the
Options.cc file of MiniSat2 as well.

Signed-off-by: Norbert Manthey <[email protected]>
CBMC compiles with more strict compiler warnings. To make the compiler
happy, extend the MiniSat patch to fix the Option.cc file as well.
Copy link
Collaborator

@martin-cs martin-cs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some of this really should be merged anyway (like the satcheck changes), some should not be merged at all (-Werror), some will need discussion and consensus. So I'm marking this as "Request changes" but really it should be "Request discussion".

@tautschnig tautschnig changed the title [WIP] Conps minisat Conps minisat [blocks: #3243] Nov 10, 2018
@TGWDB
Copy link
Contributor

TGWDB commented Jun 9, 2021

Closing as this has long been left and no progress appears imminent. Also see comments on #6088 related to these kinds of changes should this be reopened or re-attempted.

Please reopen if you believe this has been closed erroneously.

@TGWDB TGWDB closed this Jun 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants