Skip to content

Consider Java implicit exceptions when building the CFG #1096

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

cristina-david
Copy link
Collaborator

@cristina-david cristina-david commented Jul 5, 2017

This is related to diffblue/test-gen#417

@cristina-david cristina-david force-pushed the feature/consider-implicit-exceptions-when-building-cfg branch from ca4389b to a45bbf6 Compare July 5, 2017 20:13
smowton
smowton previously approved these changes Jul 5, 2017
Copy link
Contributor

@smowton smowton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ unsigned java_method_parameter_slots(const code_typet &t)
return slots;
}


Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this change seems unnecessary

@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ unsigned java_method_parameter_slots(const code_typet &t)
return slots;
}


Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The commit message does not match the change (which itself seems spurious).

@cristina-david cristina-david force-pushed the feature/consider-implicit-exceptions-when-building-cfg branch from a45bbf6 to a80d82a Compare July 6, 2017 10:23
@cristina-david
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@peterschrammel I removed the empty commit.

@smowton smowton force-pushed the feature/consider-implicit-exceptions-when-building-cfg branch from a80d82a to 85b2a6d Compare July 12, 2017 15:09
@smowton smowton merged commit 2c29180 into diffblue:test-gen-support Jul 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants