-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Add some more dtypes: Date, Datetime, Duration, String #197
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
07bb3d8
add some more dtypes
MarcoGorelli 1d7682c
add Date
MarcoGorelli 82bc5cb
remove notes on nbits
MarcoGorelli 3194335
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into more-dtypes
MarcoGorelli f5c4e55
remove Date, note lack of guarantees
MarcoGorelli ed2dbbf
Merge branch 'main' into more-dtypes
rgommers 188a75f
remove ns
MarcoGorelli a90e3fe
fixup
MarcoGorelli ea56e11
put Date back
MarcoGorelli a96d9c4
fixup
MarcoGorelli 1e09ea9
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into more-dtypes
MarcoGorelli a28f210
postmerge fixup
MarcoGorelli e4f3e7f
add future annotations import
MarcoGorelli File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How is this date supposed to be represented? (Keith asked the same question at the time of review (#197 (comment)), but resolved the comment without that there was any answer).
I certainly understand that we can say there is no guarantee about the range of dates that is supported by each library, but we still need to specify how to interpret the data. This is an interchange protocol where users access the buffers, not a standard API where only behaviour matters. So what does the buffer of (supposingly) integers mean here?
Is it like a numpy
datetime64[D]
?For example Arrow supports integers representing both days or milliseconds.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Whoops, sorry ignore my comment, I thought I was commenting on a PR for the interchange protocol, but this is for the standard API ;) So here of course only behaviour matters, and the underlying buffers are an implementation detail of the library.
Was confused because we linked to this from a discussion about supporting "date" in the interchange protocol in the pyarrow implementation.