Skip to content

chore: update typescript-eslint monorepo to v4.3.0 #2150

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2020

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 28, 2020

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin devDependencies minor 4.2.0 -> 4.3.0
@typescript-eslint/parser devDependencies minor 4.2.0 -> 4.3.0

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint

v4.3.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: added safe getTypeOfPropertyOfType wrapper (#​2567) (7cba2de)
  • experimental-utils: treat RuleTester arrays as readonly (#​2601) (8025777)
Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-invalid-void-type] add option to allow this: void (#​2481) (ddf5660)

Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 4ada483 to 729a23f Compare September 28, 2020 19:10
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore: update dependency @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin to v4.3.0 chore: update typescript-eslint monorepo to v4.3.0 Sep 28, 2020
@iamscottcab iamscottcab merged commit 3363fd6 into master Sep 28, 2020
@iamscottcab iamscottcab deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch September 28, 2020 23:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants