-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
Theme update #138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Theme update #138
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying coderabbit-docs with
|
Latest commit: |
1288ae3
|
Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
Preview URL: | https://970bbe3c.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev |
Branch Preview URL: | https://new-theme-colors-and-logo-c.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev |
221699f
to
5d3daa8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/css/custom.css (2)
31-37
: Ensure consistent color hierarchy in dark theme.The dark theme color progression seems inconsistent:
- Colors go from 50% opacity (
#ff865b80
) to solid (#ff865b
)- The lightest color (
#171717
) is actually very dark, which seems counterintuitive
Consider maintaining a more logical progression in the color scale.- --ifm-color-primary-lightest: #171717; + --ifm-color-primary-lightest: #ff865b0d;
Line range hint
45-156
: Remove duplicated CSS blocks.Several CSS blocks are duplicated in the file:
.navbar .navbar__item
styles- Mobile view adjustments
- Discord link centering
- Media queries for hiding elements
Remove the duplicated blocks to maintain a cleaner codebase and prevent potential maintenance issues.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
static/img/favicon.ico
is excluded by!**/*.ico
,!**/*.ico
static/img/logo/bw_coderabbit.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
,!**/*.svg
static/img/logo/white_coderabbit.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
,!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docusaurus.config.ts
(1 hunks)src/css/custom.css
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docusaurus.config.ts (1)
169-170
: LGTM! Let's verify the logo files.
The changes properly implement dark mode support with dedicated logos and follow a clear naming convention.
Let's verify that the new logo files exist in the correct locations:
✅ Verification successful
Logo files verified successfully ✓
Both logo files exist at the expected locations:
static/img/logo/bw_coderabbit.svg
static/img/logo/white_coderabbit.svg
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the new logo files
# Expected: Both logo files should exist in the static/img/logo/ directory
echo "Checking for logo files..."
fd -t f "bw_coderabbit.svg|white_coderabbit.svg" static/
Length of output: 192
src/css/custom.css (1)
41-43
: LGTM!
Proper application of the base font family using CSS variable.
No description provided.