Skip to content

docs: removed duplicate content from review-instructions.md #113

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

tyaga001
Copy link
Contributor

@tyaga001 tyaga001 commented Oct 21, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced clarity and organization of the code review instructions.
    • Added examples and refined descriptions in the "Path-based instructions" and "Rule object" sections.
    • Updated the "Packages" section with explicit instructions for custom package usage.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitaidev bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the document docs/guides/review-instructions.md to enhance clarity and organization. Key changes include a rephrased introduction, a new example in the "Path-based instructions" section, streamlined content in the "Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) based instructions" section, expanded explanations in the "Rule object" section, and updated guidelines for the "Packages" section. These modifications aim to improve the instructional quality and usability of the document for developers.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/guides/review-instructions.md - Rephrased introduction for readability.
- Added a block quote example in "Path-based instructions."
- Streamlined "AST based instructions" by removing redundancy.
- Expanded "Rule object" section with refined descriptions and examples.
- Updated "Packages" section with clearer requirements and instructions.

Possibly related PRs

  • update: introduction, added a CTA and improved image SEO #108: This PR directly modifies the same document (docs/guides/review-instructions.md) as the main PR, enhancing the section on Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) based instructions, which aligns with the main PR's focus on improving clarity and organization in the same document.

Suggested reviewers

  • harjotgill

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitaidev in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitaidev generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitaidev modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitaidev in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitaidev gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitaidev read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitaidev read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitaidev help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitaidev pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitaidev resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitaidev review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitaidev full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitaidev summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitaidev resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitaidev configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitaidev help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitaidev ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitaidev summary or @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitaidev or @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Deploying coderabbit-docs with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: ff4e01a
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://336636de.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://remove-duplicate.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitaidev coderabbitaidev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs/guides/review-instructions.md (2)

20-22: Remove trailing space and LGTM on content addition.

The new example enhances the explanation of path-based instructions. However, there's a minor formatting issue to address:

Please remove the trailing space at the end of line 20.

The added example in the blockquote (lines 21-22) is a good addition that clarifies the use case for path-based instructions.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

20-20: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)


Line range hint 192-236: Improved clarity in the Packages section.

The updates to the Packages section significantly enhance its usability:

  1. The requirements for custom packages are now clearly stated.
  2. The folder structure for packages is explicitly defined.
  3. The example configuration helps users understand how to implement packages.

These changes will make it easier for users to work with and create custom packages.

Consider adding a brief explanation of why the rules and utils directory names are keywords. This could help users understand the importance of this structure.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

20-20: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7f5fb69 and ff4e01a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/guides/review-instructions.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
docs/guides/review-instructions.md

20-20: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/guides/review-instructions.md (2)

Line range hint 32-38: LGTM: Improved clarity in AST-based instructions section.

The reorganization of this section enhances clarity and maintains focus on the key functionality of ast-grep. The removal of redundant introductory sentences streamlines the content effectively.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

20-20: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)


Line range hint 132-190: Excellent expansion of the Rule object and categories explanation.

The additions to this section significantly improve the documentation:

  1. The expanded "Rule object" section provides a more comprehensive explanation of the core concept.
  2. The new "Rule Categories" subsections offer a clear breakdown of Atomic, Relational, and Composite rules.
  3. The examples for each rule type effectively illustrate their application.

These changes will greatly enhance users' understanding of the ast-grep rule system.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

20-20: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)

@tyaga001 tyaga001 merged commit 0f4ed2b into main Oct 21, 2024
2 checks passed
@tyaga001 tyaga001 deleted the remove-duplicate branch October 21, 2024 16:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants