You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current “Review pull requests” guide covers review triggers, interactions, and commands but doesn’t clearly state upfront who is eligible for a CodeRabbit review. Readers must infer from examples and scattered notes. Surfacing eligibility rules before diving into automation details will reduce confusion and make plan requirements explicit.
Approach
We will modify docs/guides/code-review-overview.md: import the ProPlanNotice MDX component at the top, then insert a new “## Review eligibility {#eligibility}” section immediately after the introduction. This section will list public vs. private repository rules as bullets, include <ProPlanNotice /> under the private-repo bullet, and resume the existing “Automatically review pull requests” section unchanged.
Reasoning
After reviewing ticket #378, we confirmed the target file path, component location and import syntax, documentation style patterns, and linking/sidebar conventions. All prerequisites are satisfied, so we can draft this precise edit plan without additional setup.
Insert a new section after the introduction (before “Automatically review pull requests”):
## Review eligibility {#eligibility}
CodeRabbit will review your pull request if one of the following is true:
-**Public repositories:** CodeRabbit reviews every PR by default.
-**Private repositories:** CodeRabbit reviews PRs only when your organization has a Pro plan and you have an assigned seat.
<ProPlanNotice />
Ensure the heading level, bullet formatting, and tone match the surrounding document. No other sections need adjustment.
Import In IDE
Developer Humor
Public PRs? Reviewed every time! 🐇
Private PRs? Only with a Pro seat, sublime ✨
Now eligibility’s clear, no more guesswork or pain
Ivory docs updated to keep knowledge in frame 📚
CodeRabbit hops in, reviews again and again! 🐰🎉
Activity
linear commentedon Jun 4, 2025
ENG-1578 Clarify who can get a PR reviewed.
traycerai commentedon Jun 4, 2025
Plan
Observations
The current “Review pull requests” guide covers review triggers, interactions, and commands but doesn’t clearly state upfront who is eligible for a CodeRabbit review. Readers must infer from examples and scattered notes. Surfacing eligibility rules before diving into automation details will reduce confusion and make plan requirements explicit.
Approach
We will modify
docs/guides/code-review-overview.md
: import theProPlanNotice
MDX component at the top, then insert a new “## Review eligibility {#eligibility}” section immediately after the introduction. This section will list public vs. private repository rules as bullets, include<ProPlanNotice />
under the private-repo bullet, and resume the existing “Automatically review pull requests” section unchanged.Reasoning
After reviewing ticket #378, we confirmed the target file path, component location and import syntax, documentation style patterns, and linking/sidebar conventions. All prerequisites are satisfied, so we can draft this precise edit plan without additional setup.
Proposed File Changes
📄 docs/guides/code-review-overview.md (MODIFY) 🔗
Import In IDE
Developer Humor
Execution Information
Branch: main
Commit: 35720e8
💡 Tips
Supported Commands (Inside Comments)
@traycerai generate
to iterate on the previous version of the implementation plan.Supported Commands (Inside Description)
@traycerai ignore
anywhere in the ticket description to prevent this ticket from being processed.@traycerai branch:<branch-name>
anywhere in the ticket description to specify the target branch for the implementation plan.Community
docs: clarify PR review eligibility (coderabbitai#378)