Skip to content

Fix branch name in test failure conditions #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: breaking-change
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

frodo-repo
Copy link

@frodo-repo frodo-repo commented Jan 24, 2025

Description

  • Corrected the branch name in the GitHub Actions workflow file from 'test-failures' to 'test-failure' to ensure proper conditional execution.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Configuration changes
github-pipelines.yml
Fix branch name in GitHub Actions workflow conditions                   

.github/workflows/github-pipelines.yml

  • Corrected branch name in conditional statements.
  • Updated from 'test-failures' to 'test-failure'.
  • +2/-2     

    🔍 Infra Scan Results:
    Failed Github_actions Checks
    Check NameFile PathLines
    Ensure top-level permissions are not set to write-all.github/workflows/github-pipelines.ymlNone-None
    💡 Usage Guide

    Checking Your Pull Request

    Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.

    Talking to CodeAnt AI

    Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:

    @codeant-ai ask: Your question here
    

    This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.

    Retrigger review

    Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:

    @codeant-ai: review
    

    Check Your Repository Health

    To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2025

    Important

    Review skipped

    Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

    Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

    You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link

    @greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    PR Summary

    This PR modifies the GitHub Actions workflow to correct branch references in failure simulation scenarios within .github/workflows/github-pipelines.yml.

    • Fixed typo in branch reference from test-failures to test-failure for failure simulation steps
    • Both failure simulation steps share the same condition github.ref == 'refs/heads/test-failure', suggesting potential redundancy
    • Missing error handling or notification mechanisms for simulated failures
    • Consider adding timeout limits for failure simulation steps to prevent hanging pipelines

    💡 (2/5) Greptile learns from your feedback when you react with 👍/👎!

    1 file(s) reviewed, 1 comment(s)
    Edit PR Review Bot Settings | Greptile

    Comment on lines 34 to 35
    run: |
    bash -c 'echo "Simulating syntax error"; if [ true ]; then echo "missing fi"'
    Copy link

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    style: Intentionally malformed bash syntax could cause pipeline debugging issues. Consider using a clearer failure simulation method.

    Copy link

    codeant-ai bot commented Jan 24, 2025

    Pull Request Feedback 🔍

    🔒 No security issues identified
    ⚡ Recommended areas for review

    Code Smell
    The if condition for simulating failure scenarios and syntax errors is directly comparing github.ref to a specific branch name. Consider using a more flexible approach, such as checking if the branch name contains a specific substring, to make the workflow more adaptable to branch naming conventions.

    @frodo-repo frodo-repo changed the title #2 Fix branch name in test failure conditions Feb 5, 2025
    @frodo-repo
    Copy link
    Author

    /improve

    @frodo-repo
    Copy link
    Author

    /improve
    --pr_code_suggestions.num_code_suggestions_per_chunk="2"
    --pr_code_suggestions.commitable_code_suggestions=true

    Copy link

    Qodo Merge was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your Git account with your Qodo account here.

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    No code suggestions found for the PR.

    @coderabbit-test coderabbit-test deleted a comment from qodo-merge-pro bot Feb 20, 2025
    Comment on lines 26 to 35
    - name: Simulate failure scenario
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/test-failures'
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/test-failure'
    run: |
    echo "Simulating build failure"
    exit 1

    - name: Simulate syntax error
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/test-failures'
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/test-failure'
    run: |
    bash -c 'echo "Simulating syntax error"; if [ true ]; then echo "missing fi"'

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Suggestion: Consolidate duplicate workflow steps

    Suggested change
    - name: Simulate failure scenario
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/test-failures'
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/test-failure'
    run: |
    echo "Simulating build failure"
    exit 1
    - name: Simulate syntax error
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/test-failures'
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/test-failure'
    run: |
    bash -c 'echo "Simulating syntax error"; if [ true ]; then echo "missing fi"'
    - name: Run test failure simulations
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/test-failure'
    run: |
    echo "Simulating build failure"
    exit 1
    echo "Simulating syntax error"
    bash -c 'echo "Simulating syntax error"; if [ true ]; then echo "missing fi"'

    @coderabbit-test coderabbit-test deleted a comment from qodo-merge-pro bot Feb 20, 2025
    @frodo-repo
    Copy link
    Author

    frodo-repo commented Feb 20, 2025

    /add_docs samwise.js
    --pr_add_docs.docs_style="Notion page"

    Copy link

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Feb 20, 2025

    The docstring command only supports the following languages: python, java, cpp, javascript, typescript, jsx, tsx, csharp

    @frodo-repo
    Copy link
    Author

    /add_docs samwise.js
    --pr_add_docs.docs_style="Notion page"

    Copy link

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Feb 20, 2025

    The docstring command only supports the following languages: python, java, cpp, javascript, typescript, jsx, tsx, csharp

    @frodo-repo
    Copy link
    Author

    /describe
    --pr_description.extra_instructions="
    For the title, use the format [type]: [summary]
    "
    --pr_description.publish_labels=true

    @arvi18
    Copy link

    arvi18 commented Apr 15, 2025

    /review
    --pr_reviewer.inline_code_comments=true
    -i
    --pr_reviewer.require_score_review=true
    --pr_reviewer.require_can_be_split_review=true

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants