-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
chore(docs): add explicit documention for parts of devcontainer spec supported by envbuilder #408
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…supported by envbuilder
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is awesome, thanks for putting this together!
Thoughts on also linking to it here? https://containers.dev/supporting
docs/devcontainer-spec-support.md
Outdated
The last column indicates any currently existing GitHub issue for tracking support for this feature. | ||
Feel free to [create a new issue](https://github.com/coder/envbuilder/issues/new) if you'd like Envbuilder to support a particular feature. | ||
|
||
| Status | Name | Description | Known Issues | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: can we sort them in lex. order?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I intentionally kept the same ordering as https://containers.dev/implementors/json_reference/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, let's leave it them. I admit this might be hard to find an interesting item without ctrl+f.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a big spec!
docs/devcontainer-spec-support.md
Outdated
|
||
| Status | Name | Description | Known Issues | | ||
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ | | ||
| **General** | | | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we present supported features first?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm going to punt on ordering for now as it's fairly easy to change in a separate PR.
Adds a nice comprehensive table detailing the parts of the spec we currently do or do not support.