-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
Yarn package version not updated #2972
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Thanks for being so quick to notice @aptalca! Yes, when we released Once #2968 passes and we merge it, I'm going to trigger a manual publish, which should publish the new version to |
I wish I could take credit 😅 Our ci notified me: https://ci.linuxserver.io/blue/organizations/jenkins/Docker-Pipeline-Builders%2Fdocker-code-server/detail/master/218/pipeline It is triggered by GitHub releases but uses yarn to install. Perhaps we should change it so it's triggered by yarn registry instead. |
Woah! Super cool that y'all have that set up.
Yeah that could be safer. Though we are working on improving our CI flow! This release today has showed the process is more fragile than it should be 😅 |
Heads-up: we're still running into issues with our publish workflow and scripts. We will continue looking into this first thing tomorrow. |
Oh, this is interesting! I noticed that it affects your install script as well, but I am not sure if it is related. We build an image with code-server with a reverse proxy and I noticed it kept building with version 3.9.1. I was able to work around it by passing |
Interesting! Thanks for the report @PatrickDerichs - we'll have to confirm once we get this fixed if that's a bug as well. |
Thanks for the heads up. We changed the trigger to check the yarn registry instead so we don't have hourly failing builds anymore. Once you fix your pipeline and push to yarn, our ci should pick it up. Thanks |
The issue has been resolved and We've also written a regression report which you can read here: #2983 |
Hi,
I noticed the yarn package version is still 3.9.1
Is it forgotten or was there an issue with the update?
In the past the update on there was more or less in sync with the GitHub releases.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: