Skip to content

snappy-java ships GPL code #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
jsievers opened this issue May 20, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

snappy-java ships GPL code #3

jsievers opened this issue May 20, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@jsievers
Copy link

this was discovered in the context of https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=461974 where Tycho wants to use a newer version of plexus-archiver.

snappy-java was recently introduced as a dependency with
475505c

snappy-java is Apache licensed but ships GPL licensed code, details see xerial/snappy-java#113

This is a license compatibility problem according to http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html and we cannot upgrade to a newer version of plexus-archiver as long as this is not solved.

@krosenvold
Copy link
Member

Ok, we'll give the snappy guys a little time to respond to their issue. In the mean time you should be fine with version 2.10.1. Unless that GPL taint issue is solved in a timely manner, I'll blow away snappy support entirely (snappy was the reason we moved to version 3.0, releases in the 2.x range are actually newer/better than the "3.X" branch right now.)

@jsievers
Copy link
Author

thanks for the fast reply and workaround proposal; we'll give version 2.10.1 a shot

@ifedorenko
Copy link

out of curiosity, have you looked at pure-java snappy implementation https://github.com/dain/snappy ?

@jsievers
Copy link
Author

jsievers commented Jun 2, 2015

while xerial/snappy-java#113 was closed as invalid, the eclipse legal team stated in the meantime that eclipse has a policy to
permit the use of GPL+Classpath Exception code with Board approval and on a case by case basis only.
Overall the effort to get this approved would not be worth it from Tycho's point of view.
Note this is the eclipse.org legal judgment in the context of EPL-licensed Tycho, Apache Foundation may have a different view on things for plexus-archiver in general.

That said we are happy with plexus-archiver 2.10.1 for now.

@jsievers
Copy link
Author

thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants