Skip to content

first pass endpoints vignette (for closing #96) (take 2) #113

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
May 26, 2023

Conversation

dsweber2
Copy link
Contributor

See #102 for actual discussion, this should be ready to merge as is.

dsweber2 and others added 11 commits May 23, 2023 12:37
namely, several endpoints are returning errors, and there are some with
uncertain sourcing. documented inline with TODOs
I hadn't compiled the html link that was broken into the actual man
pages.
I added links to `covidcast_epidata` to `covidcast_meta` and
`covidcast`, and an example of the use of * to covidcast.
When I compiled the roxygen2 docs, an extra \details{ appeared, which I
assume is because of a change someone else made that didn't get compiled in.
the delphi endpoint's fetch_classic output has been modified to just
names, since the full output is too long
Secrets moved to the .Reviron file.
Duplicate copy of Google Health Trends removed
various references fixed
@dsweber2 dsweber2 enabled auto-merge May 26, 2023 00:42
Copy link
Contributor

@dshemetov dshemetov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Few typos in docs, otherwise we're ready to merge 🚀 🚀 🚀

@dsweber2
Copy link
Contributor Author

and done

@brookslogan
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #96.

`fetch()` now raises epidata errors and warnings and returns `$epidata`, rather
than the result-message-epidata triplet; update vignette to remove `$epidata`.
Also, index to get the first and only forecast returned.
Copy link
Contributor

@brookslogan brookslogan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes were already approved in #102 + a few typos and a compatibility update have been addressed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants