-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
Add API doc for Google-Symptoms indicator #273
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Issue here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I realize this isn't done; just some suggestions
search term within a geographic region. Thus, values are not comparable between | ||
geographic regions. Larger numbers represent higher numbers of symptom-related |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it true that values are not comparable between geographic regions, and you can only use time series in one region? I thought the population normalization was supposed to make them comparable somehow.
If they're not comparable, that's a pretty big caveat, and probably deserves its own paragraph with a bold Warning label.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, they are not comparable across regions since they are scaled by regional specific maximum value at a certain time point.
Co-authored-by: Alex Reinhart <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alex Reinhart <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alex Reinhart <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alex Reinhart <[email protected]>
combined_symptoms
signalcombined_symptoms
signalStill wait for Roni's decision on this.
The rest of it is ready for a review.