-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
Switch to geo utils for combined Quidel pipeline #308
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
quidel/delphi_quidel/run.py
Outdated
@@ -4,9 +4,6 @@ | |||
This module should contain a function called `run_module`, that is executed | |||
when the module is run with `python -m MODULE_NAME`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fill in MODULE_NAME
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're getting a fair number of errors/warnings from pylint. Most of them are of the "too many arguments" and "doesn't conform to snake_case" type, but here are a few that might impact result accuracy:
delphi_quidel/geo_maps.py:33:20: W0212: Access to a protected member _load_crosswalk of a client class (protected-access)
delphi_quidel/geo_maps.py:35:18: E1136: Value 'fips_to_state' is unsubscriptable (unsubscriptable-object)
delphi_quidel/geo_maps.py:37:26: W0212: Access to a protected member _load_crosswalk of a client class (protected-access)
delphi_quidel/geo_maps.py:39:16: E1136: Value 'fips_to_state' is unsubscriptable (unsubscriptable-object)
This one is dangerous because you might intercept an exception type you weren't expecting:
delphi_quidel/generate_sensor.py:96:8: W0702: No exception type(s) specified (bare-except)
Test coverage is good and all tests pass.
A bit more docstring coverage would be nice. Some of the docstrings are also out of date (list arguments that no longer exist or go by different names now).
Good division of functions into topic-separated files!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
closes #253