-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
test: Vspecinteg2 #3249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: Vspecinteg2 #3249
Conversation
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
1 minor change, otherwise LGTM
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
8f736c9
to
9c0b413
Compare
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3249 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.79% 88.79%
=======================================
Files 203 203
Lines 17978 17978
=======================================
Hits 15963 15963
Misses 2015 2015 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Co-authored-by: Basil Beirouti <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Basil Beirouti <[email protected]>
Issue #, if available:
Adding an integration test that requires some ECR permissions. Those ECR permissions are added to the pull request role here:
https://code.amazon.com/reviews/CR-71433937/revisions/3#/diff
Description of changes:
This integration test checks that creating a model package is possible by passing a validation spec. Note that our Prod account is hardcoded to not allow network isolation:
https://code.amazon.com/packages/MaeveControlPlaneService/blobs/mainline/--/src/com/amazonaws/services/ironman/validation/NetworkIsolationValidator.java
This makes model package created by my integration test complete, but in a failed state. This does not happen in my personal stack, only in dev-prod account. It does not affect the integration test, since the model package still creates successfully.
Testing done:
Testing in personal stack as well as on dev prod account
Merge Checklist
Put an
x
in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.General
Tests
unique_name_from_base
to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.