Skip to content

fix: make 'ModelInput' field optional for inference recommendation #3220

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

rahven14
Copy link
Contributor

@rahven14 rahven14 commented Jul 8, 2022

Issue #, if available: N/A

Description of changes: Make 'ModelInput' field optional for inference recommendation and refactor code for better readability.

Testing done: units

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backword compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
  • I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 1f3fbe7
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 8, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3220 (e51e492) into master (9369a87) will decrease coverage by 0.61%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3220      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.46%   88.85%   -0.62%     
==========================================
  Files         848      203     -645     
  Lines       72426    17950   -54476     
==========================================
- Hits        64796    15949   -48847     
+ Misses       7630     2001    -5629     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/sagemaker/utils.py 92.51% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
...on3.8/site-packages/sagemaker/debugger/__init__.py
...ib/python3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/exceptions.py
...thon3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/lineage/context.py
...3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/wrangler/processing.py
...3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/jumpstart/accessors.py
...b/python3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/local/utils.py
...python3.8/site-packages/sagemaker/lineage/query.py
...agemaker/serverless/serverless_inference_config.py
...on3.8/site-packages/sagemaker/sklearn/estimator.py
... and 636 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9369a87...e51e492. Read the comment docs.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 1f3fbe7
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 1f3fbe7
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 1f3fbe7
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 1f3fbe7
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Comment on lines 787 to 805
if data_input_configuration is not None:
obj.update(
{
"Framework": framework,
"FrameworkVersion": framework_version,
"NearestModelName": nearest_model_name,
"ModelInput": {
"DataInputConfig": data_input_configuration,
},
}
)
else:
obj.update(
{
"Framework": framework,
"FrameworkVersion": framework_version,
"NearestModelName": nearest_model_name,
}
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit : Can the obj be partially updated also? Then we can refactor the code saying update the 3 fields(Framework, FrameworkVersion, NearestModelName) first and then if data_input_configuration is not none then update ModelInput

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this can be refactored. Thank you for pointing this out!

@@ -3319,7 +3317,6 @@ def test_register_inference_image(sagemaker_session):
framework = "TENSORFLOW"
framework_version = "2.9"
nearest_model_name = "resnet50"
data_input_config = '{"input_1":[1,224,224,3]}'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have atleast 1 new test where we check for data_input_config if not already present.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is already present in the existing test files.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 037a574
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: e51e492
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: e51e492
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 037a574
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: e51e492
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 037a574
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: e51e492
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 037a574
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: e51e492
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: e51e492
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: e51e492
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@shreyapandit shreyapandit merged commit c0929cc into aws:master Jul 12, 2022
JoseJuan98 pushed a commit to JoseJuan98/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2023
…ws#3220)

* fix: make 'ModelInput' field optional for inference recommendation

* fix: refactor code to conditionally update container object
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants