Skip to content

fix: Add back Prevent passing PipelineVariable object into image_uris.retrieve #3130

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2022

Conversation

qidewenwhen
Copy link
Member

@qidewenwhen qidewenwhen commented May 24, 2022

This reverts commit 4d9c92c.

Issue #, if available: #3024

Description of changes: This PR adds back the previous reverted change: edd2463, since the dependent Project service has locked the sagemaker SDK version on their templates and the deployment has completed.

Testing done: unit tests

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backword compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
  • I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 251f2eb
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 251f2eb
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 24, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3130 (3b7ce08) into master (c53bbbc) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3130      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.71%   89.64%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files        1048      200     -848     
  Lines       87496    17329   -70167     
==========================================
- Hits        78493    15534   -62959     
+ Misses       9003     1795    -7208     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/sagemaker/image_uris.py 98.00% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
src/sagemaker/workflow/entities.py 97.50% <100.00%> (ø)
...packages/sagemaker/workflow/execution_variables.py
...e-packages/sagemaker/debugger/framework_profile.py
...thon3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/jumpstart/utils.py
...x/py37/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/s3.py
...thon3.8/site-packages/sagemaker/apiutils/_utils.py
...hon3.6/site-packages/sagemaker/workflow/airflow.py
....8/site-packages/sagemaker/jumpstart/exceptions.py
...thon3.8/site-packages/sagemaker/mxnet/estimator.py
... and 840 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c53bbbc...3b7ce08. Read the comment docs.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 251f2eb
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 251f2eb
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 251f2eb
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 251f2eb
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 85163ac
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 85163ac
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 85163ac
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 85163ac
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 85163ac
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@navinsoni navinsoni changed the title Add back Prevent passing PipelineVariable object into image_uris.retrieve fix: Add back Prevent passing PipelineVariable object into image_uris.retrieve May 25, 2022
@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 3b7ce08
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 3b7ce08
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 3b7ce08
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 3b7ce08
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 3b7ce08
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 3b7ce08
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 3b7ce08
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 3b7ce08
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@navinsoni navinsoni merged commit 19b5560 into aws:master May 25, 2022
@advaithasabnis
Copy link

Are the sagemaker templates updated? The templates pass pipeline variables to image_uris.retrieve and projects built using the templates are broken now because of this change.

@qidewenwhen
Copy link
Member Author

qidewenwhen commented Jun 1, 2022

Are the sagemaker templates updated? The templates pass pipeline variables to image_uris.retrieve and projects built using the templates are broken now because of this change.

Hi @advaithasabnis, sorry for the inconvenience caused. As far as I know, the project team has locked the Sagemaker SDK version in the current template in their backend. Same time the updated template (as per this PR) is under deployment.

@qidewenwhen qidewenwhen deleted the img branch January 25, 2024 18:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants