add new sklearn release 1.0-1

[lorenzwalthert]

Issue #, if available:

#3061

Description of changes:

Add support for new scikit learn framework version. There were two previously supported versions:

• 0.20.0
• 0.23-1

I have replaced all instances of the version 0.23-1 with 1.0-1 in python source files. Documentation examples were also adapted where appropriate, some of them alos had 0.20.0. However, there were still some (integration) tests, documentation and CLI functionality that used the 0.20.0 version. Please advise what to do there, I currenlty left these unchanged.

Testing done:

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
• I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backword compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
• I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
• I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
• I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
• I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
• I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
• I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
• Commit ID: 27383ea
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #3125 (1aaa1fa) into master (621e70e) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3125   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.61%   89.62%           
=======================================
  Files         200      200           
  Lines       17356    17356           
=======================================
+ Hits        15554    15555    +1     
+ Misses       1802     1801    -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/sagemaker/workflow/_utils.py	96.12% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/session.py	71.05% <0.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 621e70e...1aaa1fa. Read the comment docs.

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
• Commit ID: 27383ea
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
• Commit ID: 27383ea
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
• Commit ID: 27383ea
• Result: FAILED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
• Commit ID: 27383ea
• Result: FAILED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
• Commit ID: 27383ea
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
• Commit ID: 1aaa1fa
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
• Commit ID: 1aaa1fa
• Result: FAILED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
• Commit ID: 1aaa1fa
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
• Commit ID: 1aaa1fa
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[lorenzwalthert]

@secastillo can you help? Without this change, the new image is not easily usable for many users.

[sagemaker-bot]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
• Commit ID: 1aaa1fa
• Result: FAILED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[lorenzwalthert]

Thanks @secastillo to pick this up in #3110. A ping for this PR or a reference to the issue would have been nice to keep track of this. Found out it was solved in #3110 by chance. Also, don't you think we should also update the tests to use 1.0-1?

[navinsoni]

@lorenzwalthert is this issue resolved for you. If yes can you please close this PR.

[lorenzwalthert]

I am not familiar enough with this package but one difference between this PR and #3110 is that here I also adapt the tests. But it has accumulated merge conflicts so let’s just close it and trust you have Integration tests elsewhere.