Skip to content

fix: jumpstart model table #2954

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2022

Conversation

bencrabtree
Copy link
Collaborator

@bencrabtree bencrabtree commented Feb 23, 2022

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:
This PR changes the data source used to populate the JumpStart available models table in docs so there are no redundant entries.

Testing done:
The doc build script was ran and verified

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backword compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
  • I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2954 (483979e) into dev (26b984a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #2954   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.81%   89.81%           
=======================================
  Files         196      196           
  Lines       16548    16548           
=======================================
  Hits        14863    14863           
  Misses       1685     1685           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 26b984a...483979e. Read the comment docs.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 483979e
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 483979e
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 483979e
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mufaddal-rohawala mufaddal-rohawala merged commit 6670e30 into aws:dev Feb 24, 2022
BasilBeirouti pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2022
jerrypeng7773 pushed a commit to jerrypeng7773/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants