Skip to content

fix: add checks for ExecutionRole in UserSettings, adds more unit tests #2657

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 27, 2021
Merged

fix: add checks for ExecutionRole in UserSettings, adds more unit tests #2657

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 27, 2021

Conversation

shreyapandit
Copy link
Contributor

@shreyapandit shreyapandit commented Sep 23, 2021

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

Add additional safety check for Execution Role when fetching from UserSettings since it is not a required parameter. Additionally, add more unit tests for all the scenarios.

Testing done:

Ran unit tests

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backword compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
  • I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 6388e53
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 70ee5eb
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@shreyapandit shreyapandit changed the title Adds check for ExecutionRole in UserSettings; Add more unit tests Adds check for ExecutionRole in UserSettings, adds more unit tests Sep 23, 2021
@shreyapandit shreyapandit changed the title Adds check for ExecutionRole in UserSettings, adds more unit tests fix: adds check for ExecutionRole in UserSettings, adds more unit tests Sep 23, 2021
@ahsan-z-khan ahsan-z-khan changed the title fix: adds check for ExecutionRole in UserSettings, adds more unit tests fix: add checks for ExecutionRole in UserSettings, adds more unit tests Sep 24, 2021
ahsan-z-khan
ahsan-z-khan previously approved these changes Sep 24, 2021
jeniyat
jeniyat previously approved these changes Sep 24, 2021
@shreyapandit shreyapandit dismissed stale reviews from jeniyat and ahsan-z-khan via 0e42e28 September 24, 2021 23:51
@jeniyat jeniyat merged commit 36a1ed4 into aws:master Sep 27, 2021
jeniyat added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2021
@shreyapandit shreyapandit deleted the update_role_fetch branch September 27, 2021 16:46
EthanShouhanCheng pushed a commit to SissiChenxy/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2022
…ts (aws#2657)

* Adds check for ExecutionRole in UserSettings; Add more unit tests

* Enhance check with default values

* remove role default

* update unit test
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants