Skip to content

Add getCallerIdentity as an STS simple method #745

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 4, 2018

Conversation

kiiadi
Copy link
Contributor

@kiiadi kiiadi commented Oct 3, 2018

Description

Mark GetCallerIdentity as a verified simple method.

Motivation and Context

GetCallerIdentity does not require any input parameters and should be exposed as a simple method on the StsClient

Testing

mvn install -pl :sts

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • Local run of mvn install succeeds
  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
  • I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
  • I have read the README document
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed
  • A short description of the change has been added to the CHANGELOG

License

  • I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

@dagnir dagnir merged commit c9d0c95 into master Oct 4, 2018
@millems millems deleted the kiiadi/sts-get-caller-id-simple-method branch October 29, 2018 20:30
@millems millems restored the kiiadi/sts-get-caller-id-simple-method branch October 29, 2018 20:30
@millems millems deleted the kiiadi/sts-get-caller-id-simple-method branch October 29, 2018 20:30
aws-sdk-java-automation added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2020
…637bc66f

Pull request: release <- staging/7386f4e3-5458-4bfa-b48d-c61d637bc66f
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants