issue #5039 - added support for fluent setters in dynamodb enhanced client

[iulianbudau]

Adding support for Fluent Setters in the DynamoDBEnhancedClient #5039.

Description

Some consumers of DynamoDbMapper (v1) configured their bean classes with fluent setters. While this is working in v1, it is not supported in v2 as it was not considered in the original design. This feature aims to introduce support for Fluent Setters in the DynamoDBEnhancedClient.

Motivation and Context

The issue was raised in #5039. Adding support for fluent setters will help achieve feature parity between DynamoDbMapper (v1) and DynamoDBEnhancedClient (v2), making it easier for consumers to migrate to v2.

Modifications

The BeanInfo is now obtained using Introspector.getBeanInfo(beanClass), which identifies bean property descriptors based on regular setters and getters. The BeanTableSchema -> StaticTableSchema<T> createStaticTableSchema(Class<T> beanClass, MetaTableSchemaCache metaTableSchemaCache) logic has been updated to invoke a new method that enhances the descriptors to support fluent setters.

Testing

Unit tests added.

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
• Local run of mvn install succeeds
• My code follows the code style of this project
• My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
• I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
• I have added tests to cover my changes
• All new and existing tests passed
• I have added a changelog entry. Adding a new entry must be accomplished by running the scripts/new-change script and following the instructions. Commit the new file created by the script in .changes/next-release with your changes.
• My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

• I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

[dagnir]

LGTM! Thanks for your contribution.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
84.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud