Skip to content

Upgrading wiremock.version to 2.24.1 #2258

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Upgrading wiremock.version to 2.24.1 #2258

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

joviegas
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Upgrading wiremock.version to 2.24.1.

Motivation and Context

  • 2.18.0 version has some CVE reported.

Testing

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • Local run of mvn install succeeds
  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
  • I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
  • I have read the README document
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed
  • A short description of the change has been added to the CHANGELOG
  • My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

  • I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

@dagnir
Copy link
Contributor

dagnir commented Apr 8, 2021

Closing this as stale for now; we need to do additional work to port existing tests to the new version.

@dagnir dagnir closed this Apr 8, 2021
aws-sdk-java-automation added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2022
…bb1f439f3

Pull request: release <- staging/456822fb-4181-4231-9923-e01bb1f439f3
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants