Skip to content

#389: Allow period, solidus, at-sign, and percent-sign in profile names #1538

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2019
Merged

#389: Allow period, solidus, at-sign, and percent-sign in profile names #1538

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2019

Conversation

jeffalder
Copy link
Contributor

Description

#389 is really annoying me. The issue has been open long enough that we should have a full set of characters.

Motivation and Context

Fixes #389

Testing

Unit tests

Screenshots (if appropriate)

n/a

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • Local run of mvn install succeeds
  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
  • I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
  • I have read the README document
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed
  • A short description of the change has been added to the CHANGELOG
  • My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

  • I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

@jeffalder
Copy link
Contributor Author

I cannot find a CLA to sign. Please let me know how to. I looked in this project, the Go SDK, and the CLI -- there was no clear path.

@jeffalder jeffalder mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2019
@millems
Copy link
Contributor

millems commented Dec 4, 2019

@jeffalder No CLA, just the "I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license" you've already acknowledged is sufficient.

Copy link
Contributor

@millems millems left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Can you squash your changes? We'll then merge them.

@jeffalder
Copy link
Contributor Author

Squashed!

@jeffalder
Copy link
Contributor Author

@millems - I'm not sure what to do about the Travis Build on JDK 11. It looks like it's consistently failing.

@millems millems merged commit 932203a into aws:master Dec 4, 2019
@millems
Copy link
Contributor

millems commented Dec 4, 2019

Merged! You can ignore the travis build.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

'.' in profile name
2 participants