Skip to content

chore: KMS keyring example #659

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 177 commits into from
May 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

RitvikKapila
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:
Adding test for KMS keyring

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Check any applicable:

  • Were any files moved? Moving files changes their URL, which breaks all hyperlinks to the files.

@RitvikKapila RitvikKapila requested a review from a team as a code owner April 18, 2024 22:36
Copy link
Contributor

@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left some comments. Code looks good, the rest is bookkeeping around comments.
Also, CI is failing. Can you debug? Let me know if you want to debug together

@RitvikKapila RitvikKapila changed the title Adding test for KMS keyring chore: KMS keyring example Apr 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, all comments are minor nits.
Let's block merge until this PR lands: #645

Base automatically changed from lucmcdon/mpl-requiredec to mpl-reviewed April 26, 2024 17:47
@RitvikKapila RitvikKapila merged commit 750bb68 into mpl-reviewed May 2, 2024
151 checks passed
@RitvikKapila RitvikKapila deleted the rkapila/mpl-requiredec branch May 2, 2024 19:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants