Skip to content

test: Run ESDK .NET v4.0.1 Test Vectors in CI #1979

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
May 10, 2024

Conversation

imabhichow
Copy link
Contributor

@imabhichow imabhichow commented Feb 6, 2024

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

  • Fetch ESDK .NET v4.0.1 Test Vectors & Run .NET v4.0.1 Test Vectors against Java in CI
  • Separate Vector Tests against Master Keys (runs when -Dmasterkey=true) and Keyrings.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Check any applicable:

  • Were any files moved? Moving files changes their URL, which breaks all hyperlinks to the files.

@imabhichow imabhichow marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2024 03:19
@imabhichow imabhichow requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2024 03:19
@imabhichow imabhichow changed the title feat: Run .NET v4.0.1 Test Vectors against Java v3.x in CI feat: Run ESDK .NET v4.0.1 Test Vectors in CI Feb 13, 2024
@imabhichow imabhichow changed the title feat: Run ESDK .NET v4.0.1 Test Vectors in CI test: Run ESDK .NET v4.0.1 Test Vectors in CI Feb 13, 2024
@imabhichow imabhichow force-pushed the imabhichow/vector-tests branch from aaad59b to 1e5ee36 Compare March 11, 2024 16:24
Copy link
Contributor

@texastony texastony left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am having a hard relating this to the Private PR that I thought did the same thing:
https://github.com/aws/private-aws-encryption-sdk-java-staging/pull/68/files#diff-e390fc0ad5f952462bfc117b51fd807859eac77e5f85a206b90747b3218c679f

Some common lines are here, but there are significant differences.
It has been a while since I looked at this code base...

I think we may need to go over this in more detail.

@josecorella josecorella merged commit 19975b9 into master May 10, 2024
45 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants