build(deps-dev): bump esbuild from 0.14.x to 0.14.23 #589
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dreamorosi
added
the
dependencies
ijemmy
previously approved these changes
Feb 25, 2022
* feat: adopted Utility class & updated unit tests * docs: added notice in docs * WIP * build: added commons dependency * deps: fixed lock * rebuilt lock after rebase * chore: update commented * set explicit packages order * amend lock * run with older * removed commons from workspace * build: added foreground-scripts flag to CI * fix: issue with workflows * fix: lock file
…wertools-typescript into build/bumb_esbuild
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of your changes
This PR bumps
esbuildto its latest version. This is a dev dependency used inexamples/cdk& in the e2e tests for each core utility and it helpscdkto bundle & transpile the functions code.I've opened this PR instead of using #588 from Dependabot because the bot was not picking up all the occurrences given they had inconsistent versions.
How to verify this change
See e2e run result: here
Related issues, RFCs
#588
PR status
Is this ready for review?: YES
Is it a breaking change?: NO
Checklist
Breaking change checklist
N/A
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.