Skip to content

feat: make getKey protected on DynamoDbPersistenceLayer #3783

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2025

Conversation

elliottohara
Copy link
Contributor

@elliottohara elliottohara commented Mar 27, 2025

Summary

Makes getKey protected so that deriving classes can determine their own key strategy.

Changes

Makes getKey protected so that deriving classes can determine their own key strategy.

Please add the issue number below, if no issue is present the PR might get blocked and not be reviewed

Issue number: closes #3781


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the idempotency This item relates to the Idempotency Utility label Mar 27, 2025
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/XS PR between 0-9 LOC label Mar 27, 2025
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Mar 27, 2025

Thanks a lot for your first contribution! Please check out our contributing guidelines and don't hesitate to ask whatever you need.
In the meantime, check out the #typescript channel on our Powertools for AWS Lambda Discord: Invite link

@github-actions github-actions bot added the feature PRs that introduce new features or minor changes label Mar 27, 2025

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions github-actions bot added do-not-merge This item should not be merged need-issue This PR needs an issue before it can be reviewed/worked on further labels Mar 27, 2025
@dreamorosi dreamorosi removed do-not-merge This item should not be merged need-issue This PR needs an issue before it can be reviewed/worked on further labels Mar 27, 2025
@dreamorosi dreamorosi self-requested a review March 27, 2025 17:06
Copy link
Contributor

@dreamorosi dreamorosi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the PR and for the discussion in the issue!

@dreamorosi dreamorosi merged commit b962be7 into aws-powertools:main Mar 27, 2025
50 checks passed
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Mar 27, 2025

Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request and thank you for helping improve everyone's experience!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature PRs that introduce new features or minor changes idempotency This item relates to the Idempotency Utility size/XS PR between 0-9 LOC
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature request: DynamoDb idempotency causes hot partions
2 participants