Skip to content

refactor(tests): use standard collections for types + refactor code #6497

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 16, 2025

Conversation

leandrodamascena
Copy link
Contributor

Issue number: #6496

Summary

Changes

PEP 585 recommends using collections for type hints instead of their typing counterparts.

Removing unused code

Fixing stuff

User experience

no changes

Checklist

If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.

Is this a breaking change?

RFC issue number:

Checklist:

  • Migration process documented
  • Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena requested a review from a team as a code owner April 16, 2025 08:02
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the tests label Apr 16, 2025
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 16, 2025
@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena self-assigned this Apr 16, 2025
@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena linked an issue Apr 16, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
2 tasks
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.16%. Comparing base (cc5e72a) to head (ae61c6d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6497      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    96.33%   96.16%   -0.17%     
===========================================
  Files          243      243              
  Lines        11833    11833              
  Branches       881      881              
===========================================
- Hits         11399    11379      -20     
- Misses         338      358      +20     
  Partials        96       96              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@leandrodamascena
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @anafalcao! Codecov is crazy.. can you please review?

@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena merged commit acb4ee7 into develop Apr 16, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena deleted the refactor/migrate-callable-general branch April 16, 2025 20:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tech debt: Update tests to enable Ruff rules
2 participants