Skip to content

refactor(data_classes): remove duplicated code #6288

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

ericbn
Copy link
Contributor

@ericbn ericbn commented Mar 18, 2025

Issue number: #6293

Summary

Changes

Remove overriding methods that have the same code as the overriden ones.

User experience

No user experience change.

Checklist

If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.

Is this a breaking change?

RFC issue number:

Checklist:

  • Migration process documented
  • Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

Remove overriding methods that have the same code as the overriden ones.
@ericbn ericbn requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2025 01:27
@ericbn ericbn requested a review from leandrodamascena March 18, 2025 01:27
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

No related issues found. Please ensure there is an open issue related to this change to avoid significant delays or closure.

@github-actions github-actions bot added do-not-merge need-issue PRs that are missing related issues labels Mar 18, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.33%. Comparing base (cdcf850) to head (a1a30f8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #6288   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    96.32%   96.33%           
========================================
  Files          242      242           
  Lines        11716    11699   -17     
  Branches       865      864    -1     
========================================
- Hits         11286    11270   -16     
+ Misses         337      336    -1     
  Partials        93       93           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena linked an issue Mar 18, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
2 tasks
@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena added event_sources Event Source Data Class utility and removed do-not-merge need-issue PRs that are missing related issues labels Mar 18, 2025
Manually checked with:

    $ pip install pylint
    $ pylint --disable=all --enable=R0801 --min-similarity-lines=1 aws_lambda_powertools/utilities/data_classes
@ericbn
Copy link
Contributor Author

ericbn commented Mar 18, 2025

Just found a few more cases of duplicated code using pylint and manually checking its report:

$ pip install pylint
$ pylint --disable=all --enable=R0801 --min-similarity-lines=1

Added a commit to the PR.

@leandrodamascena
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ericbn! Do you need my review now or are you still doing some work?

@ericbn
Copy link
Contributor Author

ericbn commented Mar 18, 2025

If you agree we can merge this. I still want to see if we can further simplify duplicated code by creating common base classes, but that's a refactoring of a different nature, so could go in a separate PR. I'm planning to check that between today and tomorrow.

@leandrodamascena
Copy link
Contributor

If you agree we can merge this. I still want to see if we can further simplify duplicated code by creating common base classes, but that's a refactoring of a different nature, so could go in a separate PR. I'm planning to check that between today and tomorrow.

I'd prefer if you just remove redundant methods in this PR and then we can decide what to do with other things in a separate PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @ericbn! just two small comments before we merge it.

@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 18, 2025
@ericbn ericbn requested a review from leandrodamascena March 18, 2025 22:03
Copy link
Contributor

@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

APROVED! Obrigado @ericbn

@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena merged commit 92458b7 into aws-powertools:develop Mar 18, 2025
15 checks passed
@ericbn ericbn deleted the data_classes_duplicated_code branch March 18, 2025 22:22
@ericbn
Copy link
Contributor Author

ericbn commented Mar 18, 2025

Created PR #6297 with the other duplicate code change discussed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement event_sources Event Source Data Class utility size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tech debt: remove duplicated code in data class
2 participants