feat(event_source): Event source dataclasses for IoT Core Registry Events

[basvandriel]

Issue number: #6110

Summary

Changes

On top of the pydantic classes for the IoT registry events, this pull request also implements the event source dataclasses.

User experience

from aws_lambda_powertools.utilities.data_classes import event_source
from aws_lambda_powertools.utilities.data_classes.iot_registry_event import IoTCoreThingEvent


@event_source(data_class=IoTCoreThingEvent)
def lambda_handler(event: IoTCoreThingEvent, context):
    print(f"Received IoT Core event type {event.event_type}")

Checklist

If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.

• Meet tenets criteria
• I have performed a self-review of this change
• Changes have been tested
• Changes are documented
• PR title follows conventional commit semantics

Is this a breaking change?

RFC issue number:

Checklist:

• Migration process documented
• Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

[basvandriel]

Closes #6110

[github-actions]

No related issues found. Please ensure there is an open issue related to this change to avoid significant delays or closure.

[basvandriel]

Hi @leandrodamascena, would you like me to add examples for every class? I already added the documentation headers, but was not sure to already implement them all since their quite identical.

[leandrodamascena]

Hi @basvandriel! SUPER THANKS for another super PR! I just left some comments to adhere to this PEP.

If possible, please add a small example for each class. If you don't have time, please let me know that I can do this.

[basvandriel]

Hi @basvandriel! SUPER THANKS for another super PR! I just left some comments to adhere to this PEP.

If possible, please add a small example for each class. If you don't have time, please let me know that I can do this.

Hi @leandrodamascena, will do! Thanks for the review. I'll try to find time to implement the examples this week.

[leandrodamascena]

Hey @basvandriel, thanks for accepting the suggestions and working to address them! I'm currently away from my computer, but I'll review everything tomorrow morning.

Everything looks good, but If any small changes are needed, I'll send a small commit and merge it. I'd like to include it in the release we're planning for tomorrow.

Thanks a lot for this another super PR! 🎉🎉👏👏

[basvandriel]

Hi @leandrodamascena, again, sorry for the late reply. Feel free to review my latest changes, I've updated documentation and added examples as discussed. I had to commit your suggested changes manually, as GitHub wouldn't let me do it in the browser. Anyway - looking forward to your response!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.25%. Comparing base (9ce2af6) to head (0fda7a5).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6123      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    96.19%   96.25%   +0.05%     
===========================================
  Files          235      236       +1     
  Lines        11229    11399     +170     
  Branches       828      828              
===========================================
+ Hits         10802    10972     +170     
  Misses         337      337              
  Partials        90       90              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[leandrodamascena]

Hi @basvandriel! Thanks a lot for working on this PR! I just made some minor changes to the documentation and added all the fields to the test file to increase coverage.

APPROVED! This will be included in the release in the next few hours!