feat(feature_flags): add intersect actions for conditions

[gwlester]

Issue number: #3531

Summary

List intersection action for conditions in feature flags

Changes

Added code to implement and docs -- missing tests.

User experience

Not practical to do.

Checklist

If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.

• Meet tenets criteria
• I have performed a self-review of this change
• Changes have been tested
• Changes are documented
• PR title follows conventional commit semantics

Is this a breaking change? NO

RFC issue number:

Checklist:

• [ x ] Migration process documented
• [ x ] Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 24 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (e14e768) 96.38% compared to head (68f16b5) 96.15%.
Report is 31 commits behind head on develop.

Files	Patch %	Lines
..._powertools/utilities/feature_flags/comparators.py	14.28%	24 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3692      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    96.38%   96.15%   -0.23%     
===========================================
  Files          214      214              
  Lines        10030    10061      +31     
  Branches      1846     1855       +9     
===========================================
+ Hits          9667     9674       +7     
- Misses         259      283      +24     
  Partials       104      104              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[leandrodamascena]

Hi @gwlester! Thanks for sending this PR so quickly. The code looks nice at first glance and works for the feature we want. We can optimize some parts, like removing code duplication where we check SchemaValidationError.

Next week we can work together on this PR to add tests and merge it.

Thanks

[gwlester]

Sounds good. Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device -------- Original message --------From: Leandro Damascena ***@***.***> Date: 2/1/24 16:41 (GMT-06:00) To: aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-python ***@***.***> Cc: Gerald Leter ***@***.***>, Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-python] feat(feature_flags): add intersect actions for conditions (PR #3692) Hi @gwlester! Thanks for sending this PR so quickly. The code looks nice at first glance and works for the feature we want. We can optimize some parts, like removing code duplication where we check SchemaValidationError. Next week we can work together on this PR to add tests and merge it. Thanks —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.8% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[heitorlessa]

Commenting so I can look into this before releasing it -- apparently we accidentally merged without confirming docs and tests etc.

Nothing that can't be fixed before release