Skip to content

Use a dedicated workflow for each sync type #7

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2021
Merged

Conversation

per1234
Copy link
Contributor

@per1234 per1234 commented Jun 15, 2021

The approach inherited from the original Bash script-based approach to syncing the repository's file duplicates was to
handle all syncing in a monolithic manner.

As I convert this to a task-based aproach, I have decided that there really isn't enough in common between the types of
files synced, nor their sync method, to justify combining them. Splitting them up allows for path filters on the workflow
triggers and more meaningful results in the event of a failure.

@per1234 per1234 added type: enhancement Proposed improvement topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure labels Jun 15, 2021
@per1234 per1234 requested review from silvanocerza and rsora June 15, 2021 02:42
The approach inherited from the original Bash script-based approach to syncing the repository's file duplicates was to
handle all syncing in a monolithic manner.

As I convert this to a task-based aproach, I have decided that there really isn't enough in common between the types of
files synced, nor their sync method, to justify combining them. Splitting them up allows for path filters on the workflow
triggers and more meaningful results in the event of a failure.
@per1234 per1234 merged commit f0ed27e into main Jun 15, 2021
@per1234 per1234 deleted the dependabot-sync branch June 15, 2021 08:10
@per1234 per1234 self-assigned this Nov 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants