Skip to content

Remove fork filter conditional from Go nightly build workflow #34

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2021

Conversation

per1234
Copy link
Contributor

@per1234 per1234 commented Jun 18, 2021

This conditional was intended to prevent the workflow from causing confusion and annoyance to contributors with no need
or interest in publishing a nightly build as it failed daily in their forks due to the necessary secrets not having been
defined.

Since the time this was added to the workflow, GitHub Actions has been changed so that, even after enabling workflows
globally, scheduled workflows are disabled in forks. The forker must manually enable each scheduled workflow. I think
that the sort of contributor who is savvy enough to enable workflows is also savvy enough to understand from the workflow
name that it does not apply to their fork and skip enabling it. Even if they did accidentally enable it, they will
remember doing so when the workflow fails later that day.

This conditional was intended to prevent the workflow from causing confusion and annoyance to contributors with no need
or interest in publishing a nightly build as it failed daily in their forks due to the necessary secrets not having been
defined.

Since the time this was added to the workflow, GitHub Actions has been changed so that, even after enabling workflows
globally, scheduled workflows are disabled in forks. The forker must manually enable each scheduled workflow. I think
that the sort of contributor who is savvy enough to enable workflows is also savvy enough to understand from the workflow
name that it does not apply to their fork and skip enabling it. Even if they did accidentally enable it, they will
remember doing so when the workflow fails later that day.
@per1234 per1234 added type: enhancement Proposed improvement topic: code Related to content of the project itself labels Jun 18, 2021
@per1234 per1234 requested review from silvanocerza and rsora June 18, 2021 10:35
@per1234 per1234 merged commit 5c38717 into main Jun 18, 2021
@per1234 per1234 deleted the fork-conditional branch June 18, 2021 10:41
@per1234 per1234 self-assigned this Nov 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: code Related to content of the project itself type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants