Skip to content

Add support for non-bundled X.509 certificates to "Check Certificates" workflow #782

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

per1234
Copy link
Contributor

@per1234 per1234 commented Oct 16, 2024

The digital certificates used for code signing are often stored in an archive file of the PKCS #12 format, which allows multiple objects to be bundled in a single file.

However, it also might occur that a single certificate is stored in X.509 format.

Previously, the "Check Certificates" workflow only supported certificates in a PKCS #12 archive. Support is hereby added to the workflow for validation of X.509 certificates in addition to PKCS #12.

…" workflow

The digital certificates used for code signing are often stored in an archive file of the PKCS arduino#12 format, which allows
multiple objects to be bundled in a single file.

However, it also might occur that a single certificate is stored in X.509 format.

Previously, the "Check Certificates" workflow only supported certificates in a PKCS arduino#12 archive. Support is hereby added
to the workflow for validation of X.509 certificates in addition to PKCS arduino#12.
@per1234 per1234 added type: enhancement Proposed improvement topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure labels Oct 16, 2024
@per1234 per1234 self-assigned this Oct 16, 2024
@per1234 per1234 merged commit 62191be into arduino:main Oct 16, 2024
10 checks passed
@per1234 per1234 deleted the x509 branch October 16, 2024 03:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant