Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe this is not appropriate, I imagine it depends on whether or not
.addressLabel
was intended to be a "catch all" or not, for the sake of efficiency I've plugged this quick fix with a question:@kittaakos
are you able to confirm if a fallback is appropriate here, or should
port.addressLabel
be our only reference as asserted in this PR, UPDATE: in that case we could go with the approach below (or change the boardsConfig object to store.addressLabel
) Thanks!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Were you able to determine why
port.addressLabel
is empty after opening a new window @davegarthsimpson?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, thanks for the important question, it's due to a chunk of code in our
reconcileAvailableBoards
method of theboards-service-provider
here where we set the port in question by copying theboardsConfig.selectedPort
object which does not contain.addressLabel
only.address
, this comment explains the reason why the author wrote this logic generally.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The other alternative would be something like this in the "culprit code":
before:
after:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That looks like the correct approach to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice catch; the fix looks good to me. The breaking change was probably here when new props were added to the
Port
but onboard#port
.