add flag to allow board options to be specified seperately from fqbn #1688
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
umbynos
added
topic: CLI
5 tasks
umbynos
force-pushed
the
umbynos/board_options
branch
2 times, most recently
from
5bf689b to
3af30e4
Compare
cmaglie
approved these changes
Mar 10, 2022
umbynos
force-pushed
the
umbynos/board_options
branch
from
3af30e4 to
11e2af5
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
before creating one)
our contributing guidelines
UPGRADING.mdhas been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)feature
The only way to specify board options is by appending them along with the fqbn
I've added a CLI flag (
--board-options) that allows to specify additional options separately from the FQBN. Of course, the old way of adding options along the FQBN is still supported. I've added this possibility because the secureboot will work with a specific board property security=sien(signature and encryption) in order to use it.titled accordingly?
no
See how to contribute