[docs] Make use of 'avr' as example platform more consistent #1680
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's fairly easy to miss the one line early in the doc that says this text uses 'avr' as an example, leading a reader to possibly believe the documentation hasn't been updated since 'avr' was the only platform choice. Within the doc, the text was a little inconsistent as to how it referred to the avr platform and platform specific tools. This change tries to standardize how we refer to the example platform.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
before creating one)
our contributing guidelines
UPGRADING.md
has been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)docs
titled accordingly?
Non-breaking
I'm happy to rework this if the intent of the change is desirable, but the exact text needs work.
See how to contribute