Skip to content

[docs] Make use of 'avr' as example platform more consistent #1680

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 4, 2022

Conversation

obra
Copy link
Contributor

@obra obra commented Mar 2, 2022

It's fairly easy to miss the one line early in the doc that says this text uses 'avr' as an example, leading a reader to possibly believe the documentation hasn't been updated since 'avr' was the only platform choice. Within the doc, the text was a little inconsistent as to how it referred to the avr platform and platform specific tools. This change tries to standardize how we refer to the example platform.

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • [X ] The PR has no duplicates (please search among the Pull Requests
    before creating one)
  • The PR follows
    our contributing guidelines
  • [N/A] Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • [ X] Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • [N/A] UPGRADING.md has been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)
  • What kind of change does this PR introduce?
    docs

Non-breaking

  • Other information:

I'm happy to rework this if the intent of the change is desirable, but the exact text needs work.


See how to contribute

It's fairly easy to miss the one line early in the doc that says this text uses 'avr' as an example, leading a reader to possibly believe the documentation hasn't been updated since 'avr' was the only platform choice. Within the doc, the text was a little inconsistent as to how it referred to the avr platform and platform specific tools. This change tries to standardize how we refer to the example platform.
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Mar 2, 2022

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@per1234 per1234 linked an issue Mar 3, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@per1234 per1234 self-assigned this Mar 3, 2022
@per1234 per1234 added topic: documentation Related to documentation for the project type: enhancement Proposed improvement labels Mar 3, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@per1234 per1234 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @obra. I recall wondering "why is this AVR-specific" some time back while reading these docs after skipping over the part in the intro.

I also remember at least one other report of the same, but didn't manage to track it down to get the specifics.

@per1234 per1234 merged commit 8b53b85 into arduino:master Mar 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: documentation Related to documentation for the project type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sketch build process documentation only talks about AVR-based boards
3 participants