[skip changelog] Improve wording of FAQ re: boards w/o dedicated VID/PID #1097
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some minor wording improvements for readability/correct terminology.
The classic Nano is the sole active official board without a custom VID/PID, so it's especially important to mention it in this FAQ.
ubidefeo
approved these changes
Dec 10, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
before creating one)
our contributing guidelines
UPGRADING.mdhas been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)Docs update.
Despite the Arduino Nano being the sole active official Arduino board without a custom VID/PID, it is not mentioned in the FAQ item about this type of board.
The classic Nano is explicitely mentioned in the FAQ item and the wording is slightly improved.
titled accordingly?
No
Related: