I2C hot switch master <-> slave #182
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… same device (Fix to be cleaned up --> too many debug comment)
aentinger
suggested changes
Nov 13, 2023
|
Before merging I'd try a cleanup to get the minimum amount of changes in IRQManager (I know it might be hard but it could avoid cross references difficult to spot and fix afterwards) |
|
This PR is not longer needed because this new PR #191 supersedes this one |
per1234
added
type: imperfection
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Solve: #180
This PR introduces the possibility to change back and forth the role on the I2C from Master to Slave and vice versa.