You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is Issue 883 moved from a Google Code project.
Added by 2012-04-09T16:17:18.000Z by [email protected].
Please review that bug for more context and additional comments, but update this bug.
Original labels: Type-Enhancement, Priority-Medium
Original description
Simple new and delete operators exist in <new.h> and <new.cpp>, but the new[] and delete[] operators do not.
These are useful when writing code that needs dynamically allocated arrays.
This will not cause any compatibility issues, as it is adding a new functionality.
This is Issue 883 moved from a Google Code project.
Added by 2012-04-09T16:17:18.000Z by [email protected].
Please review that bug for more context and additional comments, but update this bug.
Original labels: Type-Enhancement, Priority-Medium
Original description
Simple new and delete operators exist in <new.h> and <new.cpp>, but the new[] and delete[] operators do not.
These are useful when writing code that needs dynamically allocated arrays.
This will not cause any compatibility issues, as it is adding a new functionality.
See #73 for a working patch and test case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: